Loading…

2016 Results for Party

First Preferences Counted as at 2:09pm 1/12/2016


Election results for each candidate in each electorate, for the selected party.
Brindabella
Candidate Votes % Votes No. of Quotas
HOLT, Andrew 767 1.6% 0.1
McKAY, Joel 1,200 2.6% 0.2
Electorate Total 1,967 4.2% 0.3
Ginninderra
Candidate Votes % Votes No. of Quotas
COOMBES, Ian 122 0.3% 0.0
DUBEY, Vijay 386 0.8% 0.0
EDWARDS, David 217 0.5% 0.0
EZEKIEL-HART, Emmanuel 342 0.7% 0.0
HUYNH, Kim 2,365 5.0% 0.3
JONES, Vanessa 242 0.5% 0.0
WATSON, Leigh 770 1.6% 0.1
ZANGL, Lea 136 0.3% 0.0
Electorate Total 4,580 9.7% 0.6
Kurrajong
Candidate Votes % Votes No. of Quotas
FATSEAS, Marea 1,597 3.3% 0.2
ROBINSON, Peter 388 0.8% 0.0
STRACHAN, Graeme 150 0.3% 0.0
Electorate Total 2,135 4.4% 0.3
Murrumbidgee
Candidate Votes % Votes No. of Quotas
WEBBER, Margaret 372 0.7% 0.0
WHYTE, Brendan 315 0.6% 0.0
Electorate Total 687 1.4% 0.1
Yerrabi
Candidate Votes % Votes No. of Quotas
EVANS, Daniel 255 0.5% 0.0
POLLARD, David 1,211 2.4% 0.1
Electorate Total 1,466 2.9% 0.2
Party Total 10,835 4.4%

Glossary - click to expand

Quota

The proportion or percentage of votes required for a candidate to be elected to the Legislative Assembly. For the ACT’s 5 member electorates the quota is approximately 16.7%

Percentages

Votes for parties, groups and candidates are always expressed as a percentage of the total formal vote in the same column. Formal and informal votes are always expressed as a percentage of the total votes in the same column. Total votes for an electorate are expressed as a percentage of the enrolment for the electorate. Total votes for the ACT are expressed as a percentage of the enrolment for the ACT.

Swings

The swings shown represent the difference in percentage terms between the result for each party and “other” candidates and the corresponding result for the 2012 election:
  •   For parties that contested the 2012 election, the swing shown is the percentage of the votes received by the party in 2016 less the percentage of the votes received by the party in 2012.
  •   For parties that did not contest the 2012 election, the swing shown is the percentage of the votes received by the party in 2016.
  •   The swing figure for “other” candidates compares results for 2016 non-party candidates with the results obtained for 2012 non-party candidates combined with any results cast in 2012 for parties that are not contesting the 2016 election.

Further information on the voting process

The total percentages of formal votes for each party. A formal vote being a valid vote; i.e. a first preference for a candidate belonging to the respective party.

The percentage of votes for each party, less the votes percentage for the respective party during the previous election.

The number of formal votes counted, the percentage, and the total enrolment

The proportion of progressive quota recieved for each of the top 5 parties, for each electorate.

The proportion of progressive quota recieved for each of the top 5 candidates in each electorate.