Loading…

2016 Results for Brindabella Candidates at Amalgamated < 20 Polling Place

First Preferences Counted as at 2:55pm 20/12/2016


Election results for each candidate in each party, counted at the specified polling place, for the selected electorate.
ACT Labor
Candidate Votes % Votes
BURCH, Joy 24 8.9%
DRAKE, Angie 20 7.4%
GENTLEMAN, Mick 33 12.2%
MAFTOUM, Karl 7 2.6%
WERNER-GIBBINGS, Taimus 16 5.9%
Group Total 100 37.0%
Animal Justice Party
Candidate Votes % Votes
O'BRIEN, Sarah 7 2.6%
SOXSMITH, Robyn 3 1.1%
Group Total 10 3.7%
Australian Sex Party ACT
Candidate Votes % Votes
BAILEY, Steven 21 7.8%
SHEPHERD, Monique 12 4.4%
Group Total 33 12.2%
Canberra Liberals
Candidate Votes % Votes
COCKS, Ed 15 5.6%
FAZEY-SOUTHWELL, Annette 9 3.3%
LAWDER, Nicole 11 4.1%
PARTON, Mark 14 5.2%
WALL, Andrew 21 7.8%
Group Total 70 25.9%
Liberal Democrats
Candidate Votes % Votes
DONNELLY, Matt 3 1.1%
GOWOR, Jacob 1 0.4%
RENET, Greg 2 0.7%
SARAGIH, Vera 1 0.4%
STRASCHKO, Matt 3 1.1%
Group Total 10 3.7%
Like Canberra
Candidate Votes % Votes
FRIEL, Timothy 1 0.4%
TUFFIN, Richard 1 0.4%
Group Total 2 0.7%
Sustainable Australia (ACT)
Candidate Votes % Votes
HASTIR, Claude 3 1.1%
KEMP, Melissa 6 2.2%
Group Total 9 3.3%
The Greens
Candidate Votes % Votes
DAVIS, Johnathan 12 4.4%
MAZENGARB, Michael 8 3.0%
MURPHY, Ben 7 2.6%
Group Total 27 10.0%
Ungrouped
Candidate Votes % Votes
HOLT, Andrew 1 0.4%
McKAY, Joel 8 3.0%
Group Total 9 3.3%
Votes % Votes
Formal Votes 270 95.4%
Informal Votes 13
Total Votes 283

Glossary - click to expand

Quota

The proportion or percentage of votes required for a candidate to be elected to the Legislative Assembly. For the ACT’s 5 member electorates the quota is approximately 16.7%

Percentages

Votes for parties, groups and candidates are always expressed as a percentage of the total formal vote in the same column. Formal and informal votes are always expressed as a percentage of the total votes in the same column. Total votes for an electorate are expressed as a percentage of the enrolment for the electorate. Total votes for the ACT are expressed as a percentage of the enrolment for the ACT.

Swings

The swings shown represent the difference in percentage terms between the result for each party and “other” candidates and the corresponding result for the 2012 election:
  •   For parties that contested the 2012 election, the swing shown is the percentage of the votes received by the party in 2016 less the percentage of the votes received by the party in 2012.
  •   For parties that did not contest the 2012 election, the swing shown is the percentage of the votes received by the party in 2016.
  •   The swing figure for “other” candidates compares results for 2016 non-party candidates with the results obtained for 2012 non-party candidates combined with any results cast in 2012 for parties that are not contesting the 2016 election.

Further information on the voting process

The total percentages of formal votes for each party. A formal vote being a valid vote; i.e. a first preference for a candidate belonging to the respective party.

The percentage of votes for each party, less the votes percentage for the respective party during the previous election.

The number of formal votes counted, the percentage, and the total enrolment

The proportion of progressive quota recieved for each of the top 5 parties, for each electorate.

The proportion of progressive quota recieved for each of the top 5 candidates in each electorate.