Loading…

2016 Results for Brindabella Candidates at Richardson Polling Place

First Preferences Counted as at 1:55pm 15/12/2016


Election results for each candidate in each party, counted at the specified polling place, for the selected electorate.
ACT Labor
Candidate Votes % Votes
BURCH, Joy 104 7.8%
DRAKE, Angie 74 5.6%
GENTLEMAN, Mick 116 8.7%
MAFTOUM, Karl 37 2.8%
WERNER-GIBBINGS, Taimus 168 12.7%
Group Total 499 37.6%
Animal Justice Party
Candidate Votes % Votes
O'BRIEN, Sarah 23 1.7%
SOXSMITH, Robyn 12 0.9%
Group Total 35 2.6%
Australian Sex Party ACT
Candidate Votes % Votes
BAILEY, Steven 89 6.7%
SHEPHERD, Monique 68 5.1%
Group Total 157 11.8%
Canberra Liberals
Candidate Votes % Votes
COCKS, Ed 69 5.2%
FAZEY-SOUTHWELL, Annette 48 3.6%
LAWDER, Nicole 98 7.4%
PARTON, Mark 136 10.2%
WALL, Andrew 116 8.7%
Group Total 467 35.2%
Liberal Democrats
Candidate Votes % Votes
DONNELLY, Matt 7 0.5%
GOWOR, Jacob 12 0.9%
RENET, Greg 7 0.5%
SARAGIH, Vera 7 0.5%
STRASCHKO, Matt 5 0.4%
Group Total 38 2.9%
Like Canberra
Candidate Votes % Votes
FRIEL, Timothy 10 0.8%
TUFFIN, Richard 12 0.9%
Group Total 22 1.7%
Sustainable Australia (ACT)
Candidate Votes % Votes
HASTIR, Claude 11 0.8%
KEMP, Melissa 15 1.1%
Group Total 26 2.0%
The Greens
Candidate Votes % Votes
DAVIS, Johnathan 7 0.5%
MAZENGARB, Michael 18 1.4%
MURPHY, Ben 9 0.7%
Group Total 34 2.6%
Ungrouped
Candidate Votes % Votes
HOLT, Andrew 22 1.7%
McKAY, Joel 28 2.1%
Group Total 50 3.8%
Votes % Votes
Formal Votes 1,328 96.9%
Informal Votes 42
Total Votes 1,370

Glossary - click to expand

Quota

The proportion or percentage of votes required for a candidate to be elected to the Legislative Assembly. For the ACT’s 5 member electorates the quota is approximately 16.7%

Percentages

Votes for parties, groups and candidates are always expressed as a percentage of the total formal vote in the same column. Formal and informal votes are always expressed as a percentage of the total votes in the same column. Total votes for an electorate are expressed as a percentage of the enrolment for the electorate. Total votes for the ACT are expressed as a percentage of the enrolment for the ACT.

Swings

The swings shown represent the difference in percentage terms between the result for each party and “other” candidates and the corresponding result for the 2012 election:
  •   For parties that contested the 2012 election, the swing shown is the percentage of the votes received by the party in 2016 less the percentage of the votes received by the party in 2012.
  •   For parties that did not contest the 2012 election, the swing shown is the percentage of the votes received by the party in 2016.
  •   The swing figure for “other” candidates compares results for 2016 non-party candidates with the results obtained for 2012 non-party candidates combined with any results cast in 2012 for parties that are not contesting the 2016 election.

Further information on the voting process

The total percentages of formal votes for each party. A formal vote being a valid vote; i.e. a first preference for a candidate belonging to the respective party.

The percentage of votes for each party, less the votes percentage for the respective party during the previous election.

The number of formal votes counted, the percentage, and the total enrolment

The proportion of progressive quota recieved for each of the top 5 parties, for each electorate.

The proportion of progressive quota recieved for each of the top 5 candidates in each electorate.