Loading…

2016 Results for Brindabella Candidates at Chisholm Polling Place

First Preferences Counted as at 2:44pm 14/12/2016


Election results for each candidate in each party, counted at the specified polling place, for the selected electorate.
ACT Labor
Candidate Votes % Votes
BURCH, Joy 150 10.3%
DRAKE, Angie 95 6.5%
GENTLEMAN, Mick 98 6.7%
MAFTOUM, Karl 42 2.9%
WERNER-GIBBINGS, Taimus 86 5.9%
Group Total 471 32.4%
Animal Justice Party
Candidate Votes % Votes
O'BRIEN, Sarah 18 1.2%
SOXSMITH, Robyn 12 0.8%
Group Total 30 2.1%
Australian Sex Party ACT
Candidate Votes % Votes
BAILEY, Steven 87 6.0%
SHEPHERD, Monique 50 3.4%
Group Total 137 9.4%
Canberra Liberals
Candidate Votes % Votes
COCKS, Ed 174 12.0%
FAZEY-SOUTHWELL, Annette 33 2.3%
LAWDER, Nicole 104 7.2%
PARTON, Mark 122 8.4%
WALL, Andrew 177 12.2%
Group Total 610 42.0%
Liberal Democrats
Candidate Votes % Votes
DONNELLY, Matt 6 0.4%
GOWOR, Jacob 9 0.6%
RENET, Greg 10 0.7%
SARAGIH, Vera 10 0.7%
STRASCHKO, Matt 2 0.1%
Group Total 37 2.5%
Like Canberra
Candidate Votes % Votes
FRIEL, Timothy 7 0.5%
TUFFIN, Richard 7 0.5%
Group Total 14 1.0%
Sustainable Australia (ACT)
Candidate Votes % Votes
HASTIR, Claude 6 0.4%
KEMP, Melissa 4 0.3%
Group Total 10 0.7%
The Greens
Candidate Votes % Votes
DAVIS, Johnathan 20 1.4%
MAZENGARB, Michael 36 2.5%
MURPHY, Ben 11 0.8%
Group Total 67 4.6%
Ungrouped
Candidate Votes % Votes
HOLT, Andrew 36 2.5%
McKAY, Joel 41 2.8%
Group Total 77 5.3%
Votes % Votes
Formal Votes 1,453 96.2%
Informal Votes 58
Total Votes 1,511

Glossary - click to expand

Quota

The proportion or percentage of votes required for a candidate to be elected to the Legislative Assembly. For the ACT’s 5 member electorates the quota is approximately 16.7%

Percentages

Votes for parties, groups and candidates are always expressed as a percentage of the total formal vote in the same column. Formal and informal votes are always expressed as a percentage of the total votes in the same column. Total votes for an electorate are expressed as a percentage of the enrolment for the electorate. Total votes for the ACT are expressed as a percentage of the enrolment for the ACT.

Swings

The swings shown represent the difference in percentage terms between the result for each party and “other” candidates and the corresponding result for the 2012 election:
  •   For parties that contested the 2012 election, the swing shown is the percentage of the votes received by the party in 2016 less the percentage of the votes received by the party in 2012.
  •   For parties that did not contest the 2012 election, the swing shown is the percentage of the votes received by the party in 2016.
  •   The swing figure for “other” candidates compares results for 2016 non-party candidates with the results obtained for 2012 non-party candidates combined with any results cast in 2012 for parties that are not contesting the 2016 election.

Further information on the voting process

The total percentages of formal votes for each party. A formal vote being a valid vote; i.e. a first preference for a candidate belonging to the respective party.

The percentage of votes for each party, less the votes percentage for the respective party during the previous election.

The number of formal votes counted, the percentage, and the total enrolment

The proportion of progressive quota recieved for each of the top 5 parties, for each electorate.

The proportion of progressive quota recieved for each of the top 5 candidates in each electorate.